Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> writes: > I was going to suggest using WaitLatchOrSocket instead of sleeping in 1 > second increment, but I see that WaitLatchOrSocket() doesn't currently > support waiting for a socket to become writeable, without also waiting > for it to become readable. I wonder how difficult it would be to lift > that restriction.
My recollection is that there was a reason for that, but I don't recall details any more. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers