Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> writes:
> I was going to suggest using WaitLatchOrSocket instead of sleeping in 1 
> second increment, but I see that WaitLatchOrSocket() doesn't currently 
> support waiting for a socket to become writeable, without also waiting 
> for it to become readable. I wonder how difficult it would be to lift 
> that restriction.

My recollection is that there was a reason for that, but I don't recall
details any more.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to