On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: > I committed the redo-routine refactoring patch. I kept the XLog prefix in > the XLogReadBufferForRedo name; it's redundant, but all the other similar > functions in xlogutils.c use the XLog prefix so it would seem inconsistent > to not have it here. Thanks! Even that will be helpful for a potential patch doing consistency comparisons of FPW with current pages having WAL of a record applied.
> I'll post a new version of the main patch shortly... Looking forward to seeing it. Regards, -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
