2014-09-04 14:37 GMT+02:00 Joel Jacobson <j...@trustly.com>: > > > On 4 sep 2014, at 11:42, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2014-09-04 11:22 GMT+02:00 Joel Jacobson <j...@trustly.com>: > >> The point was, RETURNS returns 1 while RETURNS SETOF returns 0 .. n. >> > > no RETURNS return "VALUE" (it is not a row) .. and in combination with > SELECT - value will be a row. RETURNS SETOF returns rows > > > I intentionally excluded the data type of what is returned. > 1 "VALUE" vs 0...n "VALUES" > Do you still fail to see the point 1 "VALUE" is special in the context of > what a function returns? >
sorry, I don't understand .. for me SRF functions are absolutly different monsters than scalar, array or composite function - so its impossible to compare it. Pavel
