2014-09-04 14:37 GMT+02:00 Joel Jacobson <j...@trustly.com>:
> On 4 sep 2014, at 11:42, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014-09-04 11:22 GMT+02:00 Joel Jacobson <j...@trustly.com>:
>> The point was, RETURNS returns 1 while RETURNS SETOF returns 0 .. n.
> no RETURNS return "VALUE" (it is not a row) .. and in combination with
> SELECT - value will be a row. RETURNS SETOF returns rows
> I intentionally excluded the data type of what is returned.
> 1 "VALUE" vs 0...n "VALUES"
> Do you still fail to see the point 1 "VALUE" is special in the context of
> what a function returns?
sorry, I don't understand .. for me SRF functions are absolutly different
monsters than scalar, array or composite function - so its impossible to