On 2014-09-06 7:34 PM, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
Anyway, I think the discussed feature to make select, update and delete
throw an error if they returned or modified <> 1 row would be more
useful as an extension of the basic sql statements instead of a plpgsql
(2) only feature to make it possible to use it from other languages and
outside functions.

I can't really say I object to this, but doing it in the PL allows the parameters to be printed as well, akin to the plpgsql.print_strict_params setting added in 9.4. Though I wonder if that would still be possible if PL/PgSQL peeked inside the parse tree a bit to pull out these constraints or something *waves hands*. Or perhaps there's a better way to attach a helpful DETAIL line to the error.


.marko


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to