On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote:
> On 5 September 2014 14:19, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Apart from above, I think for this patch, cat version bump is required
>> > as I have modified system catalog.  However I have not done the
>> > same in patch as otherwise it will be bit difficult to take performance
>> > data.
>> One regression failed on linux due to spacing issue which is
>> fixed in attached patch.
> Here's a set of test results against this patch:

Many thanks for taking the performance data.  This data clearly shows
that there is a performance improvement at even lower configuration,
however the real benefit of the patch can be seen with higher core
m/c and with larger RAM (can contain all the data).

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Reply via email to