On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > On 5 September 2014 14:19, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Apart from above, I think for this patch, cat version bump is required >> > as I have modified system catalog. However I have not done the >> > same in patch as otherwise it will be bit difficult to take performance >> > data. >> >> One regression failed on linux due to spacing issue which is >> fixed in attached patch. > > > Here's a set of test results against this patch:
Many thanks for taking the performance data. This data clearly shows that there is a performance improvement at even lower configuration, however the real benefit of the patch can be seen with higher core m/c and with larger RAM (can contain all the data). With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
