2014-09-11 22:01 GMT+09:00 k...@rice.edu <k...@rice.edu>:

> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:37:07AM -0300, Arthur Silva wrote:
> > I agree that there's no reason to fix an algorithm to it, unless maybe
> it's
> > pglz.
Yes, it seems difficult to judge only  the algorithm performance.
We have to start to consider source code maintenance, quality and the other

> The big (huge) win for lz4 (not the HC variant) is the enormous compression
> and decompression speed. It compresses quite a bit faster (33%) than snappy
> and decompresses twice as fast as snappy.

Show us the evidence. Postgres members showed the test result and them
It's very objective comparing.

Best Regards,
Mitsumasa KONDO

Reply via email to