2014-09-11 22:01 GMT+09:00 k...@rice.edu <k...@rice.edu>:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:37:07AM -0300, Arthur Silva wrote:
> > I agree that there's no reason to fix an algorithm to it, unless maybe
> > pglz.
Yes, it seems difficult to judge only the algorithm performance.
We have to start to consider source code maintenance, quality and the other
> The big (huge) win for lz4 (not the HC variant) is the enormous compression
> and decompression speed. It compresses quite a bit faster (33%) than snappy
> and decompresses twice as fast as snappy.
Show us the evidence. Postgres members showed the test result and them
It's very objective comparing.