2014-09-11 22:01 GMT+09:00 k...@rice.edu <k...@rice.edu>: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:37:07AM -0300, Arthur Silva wrote: > > I agree that there's no reason to fix an algorithm to it, unless maybe > it's > > pglz. > Yes, it seems difficult to judge only the algorithm performance. We have to start to consider source code maintenance, quality and the other factors..
> The big (huge) win for lz4 (not the HC variant) is the enormous compression > and decompression speed. It compresses quite a bit faster (33%) than snappy > and decompresses twice as fast as snappy. Show us the evidence. Postgres members showed the test result and them consideration. It's very objective comparing. Best Regards, -- Mitsumasa KONDO
