Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> At 07:39 PM 2/11/2002 +1100, Philip Warner wrote:

> The latter time is actually quote good; when the machine is more
> heavily loaded it goes up to 10000ms.
> 
> We currently vacuum/analyze daily, and analyze hourly.

Why not vacuum hourly (regular non-blocking vacuum, not FULL)?

-Doug

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to