Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 07:39 PM 2/11/2002 +1100, Philip Warner wrote:
> The latter time is actually quote good; when the machine is more > heavily loaded it goes up to 10000ms. > > We currently vacuum/analyze daily, and analyze hourly. Why not vacuum hourly (regular non-blocking vacuum, not FULL)? -Doug ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster