On 2014-09-19 12:38:39 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I would not (nor do I feel that I did..) have committed it over a
> specific request to not do so from another committer.  I had been hoping
> that there would be another review coming from somewhere, but there is
> always a trade-off between waiting longer to get a review ahead of a
> commit and having it committed and then available more easily for others
> to work with, review, and generally moving forward.

Sure, there is such a tradeoff. But others have to wait months to get
enough review.  The first revision of the patch in the form you
committed was sent 2014-08-19, the first marked *ready for review* (not
my words) is from 2014-08-30. 19 days really isn't very far along the
tradeoff from waiting for a review to uselessly waiting.


Andres Freund

 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to