2014-09-22 12:36 GMT+04:00 Marko Tiikkaja <ma...@joh.to>: > On 9/22/14 9:45 AM, Dmitriy Igrishin wrote: > >> 2014-09-22 11:35 GMT+04:00 Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varra...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Dmitriy Igrishin <dmit...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Why are you using close() instead of PQfinish()? >>>> >>> >>> Because I'm testing for an error, please read my message and the >>> original bug report. >>> >>> I read it. You are testing for an error, but use libpq in a wrong way in >> your test case. You must use PQfinish() to close the connection >> and PQstatus() will works for you. >> > > Perhaps you should go back and re-read it then. The point of the test > case is not to test connection closure; it's to test behaviour in the > presence of network errors.
And where the network error emulation in the test case? By closing fd? I'm sorry if I don't understand something, but really, I don't see any problem or incorrect behavior of *libpq*. It's behavior adequate to a test case. > > > > .marko > -- // Dmitriy.
