On 2014-10-02 10:40:30 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >> OK.
> > Given that the results look good, do you plan to push this?
> By "this", you mean the increase in the number of buffer mapping
> partitions to 128, and a corresponding increase in MAX_SIMUL_LWLOCKS?
Yes. Now that I think about it I wonder if we shouldn't define
#define MAX_SIMUL_LWLOCKS (NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS + 64)
or something like that?
> If so, and if you don't have any reservations, yeah I'll go change it.
Yes, I'm happy with going forward.
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: