On 10/03/2014 05:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 01:57:01AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2014-10-03 19:54:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >>>> Agreeed. Also, reality check --- we can't change postgresql.conf easily >>>> without an initdb, and I think our last 9.4 initdb is going to be >>>> 9.4beta3, which is going to be packaged on Monday. >>> >>> Good point: independently of all else, it's a bit late to be adding new >>> features to 9.4. >> >> This is getting absurd. The feature was there three days ago. > > My point is we have to have in there/decide by Monday or it isn't going > to be in 9.4. I am unclear how we can resolve all the concerns about > its addition in that short of a time.
Am I correct in that we still don't have any docs for this even if we decided to accept the GUC? On that basis, I'd say accept the DEFINE and punt the GUC to the next 9.5 Commitfest ... assuming someone wants to write docs. Heck, I might write them after some testing. But that testing won't happen in time for 9.4 release. I certainly couldn't write the docs now. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
