On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The levenshtein-distance thingy seems to still be a topic of debate > as well, both as to how we're going to refactor the code and as to > what the exact hinting rules ought to be. If some committer wants > to take charge of it and resolve those issues, fine; but I don't want > to see it done by just blindly committing whatever the last submitted > version was. > My 2c. I imagine that in this case the consensus is going to be first: - Move a minimum of the core functions of fuzzystrmatch and rename them (str_distance?) - Do not dump fuzzystrmatch and have the levenshtein call those functions In any case levenshtein code needs a careful refactoring and some additional thoughts first before the hint code is touched. Regards. -- Michael
