On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > YES, which is why I specifically requested the ability to reference > "the incoming data".
My point is that people are not really inclined to use an alias in UPDATEs in general when referring to the target. The thing that seems special (and worthy of special qualification) is the reference to what you call the "incoming data", and what I've called "tuples proposed for insertion" (after being affected by any before row triggers). -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
