On 10 October 2014 13:43, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 10 October 2014 11:45, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > >> To be honest, this all sounds rather flaky. > > To be honest, suggesting anything at all is rather difficult and I > recommend people try it.
I have, and most ideas I've had have been justifiably shot down or picked apart (scheduled background tasks, offloading stats collection to standby, index maintenance in DML query plans, expression statistics... to name but a few). > Everything sounds crap when you didn't think of it and you've given it > an hour's thought. I'm not sure that means my concerns aren't valid. I don't think it sounds crap, but I also can't see any use-case for it where we don't already have things covered, or where it's going to offer any useful level of security. Like with RLS, it may be that I'm just looking at things from the wrong perspective. -- Thom -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers