On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 02:36:55PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:56:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > David G Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes: > > > The question is whether we explain the implications of not being > > > WAL-logged > > > in an error message or simply state the fact and let the documentation > > > explain the hazards - basically just output: > > > "hash indexes are not WAL-logged and their use is discouraged" > > > > +1. The warning message is not the place to be trying to explain all the > > details. > > OK, updated patch attached.
Patch applied. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
