"Doyle, Bryan" <[email protected]> writes:
> Would specifying a special value for the service name, perhaps [%], be an
> acceptable implementation of this enhancement/fix to my above concerns?
> Example:
> # comment
> [%]
> host=%.domain.com
> port=5433
> user=admin
This doesn't seem like a terribly good idea, because such an entry would
capture *any* service name whatsoever. And, since we check service names
before other possibilities such as host/database names, the entry would
then proceed to capture every possible connection request.
I follow what you're trying to do, but it needs to be a more constrained
syntax. One possibility is to insist that the wildcard be only a part
of the name string, eg
[myservers-%]
host=%.domain.com
port=5433
user=admin
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
