Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > I don't think that this is a good idea, have a look at bb3f839 explaining > that this alternate output may happen when a checkpoint kicks in. Simple > patch is attached.
Pushed, thanks. (The 9.4 branch was broken too, but differently :-()
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
