Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom, my understanding is that CONVERT stuff required an initdb, and was > > also the only thing 'critical' that went in ... correct? What impact does > > that have? For instance, could it cause one of the regression tests to > > fail, or is it something that is relatively benign? > > I would like to think it's a pretty safe change, but that's why we do > betas ;-). > > More seriously, we are still attacking various portability issues, and > there is still some undone docs work. I doubt we can make a tarball > tomorrow that is an honest release candidate. Maybe Monday?
OK, but we are already in month 2, week 1 on beta. As some point, we have to decide we are not going to do any more platform tweeking and move on to a release. If they really wanted their platform supported, they should have shown up on September. I am loosing tolerance for these last-minute changes. We should not hold up release to support some obscure platform. I don't think we want another 4 month beta! -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
