Tomas Vondra <t...@fuzzy.cz> writes: > So maybe we shouldn't cling to the WAL-logging approach too much. Maybe > Heikki's idea from to abandon the full checkpoint and instead assume > that once the transaction commits, all the files were fsynced OK. Of > couse, this will do nothing about the replay hazards.
Well, I'm not insisting on any particular method of getting there, but if we're going to touch this area at all then I think "fix the replay hazards" should be a non-negotiable requirement. We'd never have accepted such hazards if CREATE DATABASE were being introduced for the first time; it's only like this because nobody felt like rewriting a Berkeley-era kluge. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers