On 2014-11-08 11:52:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Adding a similar > level of burden to support a feature with a narrow use-case seems like > a nonstarter from here.
I don't understand this statement. In my experience the lack of a usable replication solution that allows temporary tables and major version differences is one of the most, if not *the* most, frequent criticisms of postgres I hear. How is this a narrow use case? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
