Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 11/08/2014 12:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> That would be my druthers. But given the lack of complaints, maybe we
>> should just stick to the more-backwards-compatible behavior until someone
>> does complain. Thoughts?
> Wouldn't that would mean we might not pick up the expected aliases in
> select row_to_json(q) from (select a,b from foo) as q(x,y)
> ? If so, I'm definitely in favor of fixing this now.
Well, it's inconsistent now. In existing releases you might or might not
get x,y:
regression=# create table foo (f1 int, f2 int);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# insert into foo values(1,2);
INSERT 0 1
regression=# select row_to_json(q) from (select f1 as a, f2 as b from foo) as
q(x,y);
row_to_json
---------------
{"x":1,"y":2}
(1 row)
regression=# select row_to_json(q) from (select f1 as a, f2 as b from foo
offset 0) as q(x,y);
row_to_json
-----------------
{"f1":1,"f2":2}
(1 row)
That seems like something that's worth fixing going forward, but it's a
lot harder to make the case that we should change it in back branches.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
