On 26 September 2014 12:40, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > But this gets at another point: the way we're benchmarking this right > > now, we're really conflating the effects of three different things: > > > > 1. Changing the locking regimen around the freelist and clocksweep. > > 2. Adding a bgreclaimer process. > > 3. Raising the number of buffer locking partitions. > > First of all thanks for committing part-1 of this changes and it > seems you are planing to commit part-3 based on results of tests > which Andres is planing to do and for remaining part (part-2), today > Were parts 2 and 3 committed in the end? -- Thom
