On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I don't recall what the problem with just swapping the names was - but > I'm pretty sure there was one... Hm. The index relation oids are > referred to by constraints and dependencies. That's somewhat > solvable. But I think there was something else as well... The reason given 2 years ago for not using relname was the fast that the oid of the index changes, and to it be refered by some pg_depend entries: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20121208133730.ga6...@awork2.anarazel.de http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/12742.1354977...@sss.pgh.pa.us Regards, -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
