On 28 October 2014 11:34, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 28/10/14 03:15, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Updated patch with those comments addressed is attached.
>>
>>
>> Great, I have no further comments so I consider this patch ready for
>> committer (and will mark it so momentarily).
> OK thanks!
>
>> Just as a note - there is the issue you raised yourself about the less than
>> perfect error message, but I really don't think it's worth the trouble to
>> have special handling for it as the message coming from the server is clear
>> enough IMHO.
> Yeah thinking the same. Let's see what others think (btw, if this code
> gets committed, be sure to mark Simon as a co-author).

Committed.

Thanks very much for pushing forwards with this.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to