On 28 October 2014 11:34, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 28/10/14 03:15, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> >>> >>> Updated patch with those comments addressed is attached. >> >> >> Great, I have no further comments so I consider this patch ready for >> committer (and will mark it so momentarily). > OK thanks! > >> Just as a note - there is the issue you raised yourself about the less than >> perfect error message, but I really don't think it's worth the trouble to >> have special handling for it as the message coming from the server is clear >> enough IMHO. > Yeah thinking the same. Let's see what others think (btw, if this code > gets committed, be sure to mark Simon as a co-author).
Committed. Thanks very much for pushing forwards with this. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers