On 11/19/2014 06:35 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 18 November 2014 21:19, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Personally, I see this as natural extension of the conditional block control
which we already have for loops with CONTINUE WHEN and EXIT WHEN. This
basically extends it to any block and it seems quite natural to have it for
me...
That's a reasonable argument to include it.
I seem to share the same opinion with Andrew: its not going to hurt to
include this, but its not gonna cause dancing in the streets either. I
would characterize that as 2 very neutral and unimpressed people, plus
3 in favour. Which seems enough to commit.
Perhaps I misunderstand, Andrew?
That's about right, although I would put it a bit stronger than that.
But if we're the only people unimpressed I'm not going to object further.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
