Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> writes: > This doesn't seem to me to be terribly well expressed (I know it's not your > fault, quite possibly it's mine.) Perhaps we should replace > [r]?[cyl](pp)? > with > (c|cpp|y|l|rc)
+1 ... the original coding is illegible already, not to mention wrong
since it will match stuff it shouldn't.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
