Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> This doesn't seem to me to be terribly well expressed (I know it's not your
> fault, quite possibly it's mine.) Perhaps we should replace
> [r]?[cyl](pp)?
> with
> (c|cpp|y|l|rc)
+1 ... the original coding is illegible already, not to mention wrong
since it will match stuff it shouldn't.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
