On 12/8/14 12:39 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> My radical proposal therefore would have been to embrace this >> inconsistency and get rid of PGC_BACKEND and PGC_SU_BACKEND altogether, >> relying on users interpreting the parameter names to indicate that >> changing them later may or may not have an effect. Unfortunately, the >> concerns about ignore_system_indexes prevent that. > > What exactly are those concerns? Do you have a link to previous discussion?
Earlier in the thread: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20108.1415120...@sss.pgh.pa.us -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
