On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 03:47:29PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 12/11/14 1:35 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I have heard repeated concerns about the commitfest process in the past > > few months. The fact we have been in a continual commitfest since > > August also is concerning. > > I realized the other day, I'm embracing the idea of a continual commitfest. > > I'm still working on patches from the last commitfest. Why not? They > didn't expire. Sure, it would have been nicer to get them done sooner, > but what are you gonna do? The fact that Nov 15 < now < Dec 15 isn't > going to change the fact that I have a few hours to spare right now and > the patches are still relevant. > > As far as I'm concerned, we might as well just have one commitfest per > major release. Call it a patch list. Make the list sortable by created > date and last-updated date, and let the system police itself. At least > that's honest.
Wow, that's radical, and interesting. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
