On 12/12/2014 06:01 AM, David G Johnston wrote: > The "patch list" concept should be formalized, and should include a > "targeted release" concept.
IMO, the "patch list" concept should be discarded in favour of a "working tree list". At this point, given the challenges the CF process faces, I can't say I'd be sad if Pg adopted GitHub's push/pull process on their infrastructure ... but I'm aware that's not going to happen, and I understand at least some of the reasons why. I'd be really happy to see the CF somewhat closer to that than a bunch of message-id copy-and-pasting and patch emailing though. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
