On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouh...@dalibo.com> wrote: > I agree with you about the problems of the v2 patch I originally sent. > I think this v3 is the right way of keeping track of .ready files, so > it's ok for me. The v3 also still applies well on current head. Simon got a good point mentioning that we can currently estimate the number of files to be archived with the information that we have now as the logic in the archiver is made as such. This information would still be useful for a node freshly promoted that needs to promote a bunch of files btw... But now there are as well discussions about having a node only archive WAL files it produces, aka a master archiving only WAL files on its current timeline, so we wouldn't really need this patch if that's done. -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
