On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > You could argue that pgBadger et al could just document that they don't > support nonstandard timestamp formats ... but then it's really unclear why > we're shifting the complexity burden in this direction rather than asking > why the one proprietary application that wants the other thing can't cope > with the existing format choice. Well, the opposite side can argue exactly the contrary with the user hat: why doesn't Postgres allow this kind of customization, knowing that the other things running on my server can do it? -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
