On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Ali Akbar <the.ap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter, while reviewing the better performing patch myself, now i think the > patch needs more work to be committed. The structuring of the method will be > confusing in the long term. I think I'll restructure the patch in the next > commitfest. > So i propose to break the patch: > 1. We apply the current patch which uses xmlNodeCopy, so that the > long-standing bug will be fixed in postgres. > 2. I'll work with the performance enhancement in the next commitfest. > > Maybe for (2), the current better-performing patch can be viewed as PoC of > the expected performance.
Ali, are you currently working on that? Would you mind re-creating new entries in the commit fest app for the new set of patches that you are planning to do? For now I am switching this patch as returned with feedback. Thanks, -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
