On 12/15/2014 11:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > I feel like we used to be better at encouraging people to participate > in the CF even if they were not experts, and to do the best they can > based on what they did know. That was a helpful dynamic. Sure, the > reviews weren't perfect, but more people helped, and reviewing some of > the patch well and some of it in a more cursory manner is way better > than reviewing none of it at all.
Well, it was strongly expressed to me by a number of senior contributors on this list and at the developer meeting that inexpert reviews were not really wanted, needed or helpful. As such, I stopped recruiting new reviewers (and, for that matter, doing them myself). I don't know if the same goes for anyone else. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
