On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> * David Rowley (dgrowle...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > I'd just like to add something which might be flying below the radar of
> > more senior people. There are people out there (ike me) working on
> > PostgreSQL more for the challenge and perhaps the love of the product,
> who
> > make absolutely zero money out of it. For these people getting credit
> where
> > it's due is very important. I'm pretty happy with this at the moment and
> I
> > can't imagine any situation where not crediting reviewers would be
> > beneficial to anyone.
>
> Thanks for this. One question which has been brought up in the past is
> the specific "level" of credit. That you're happy with the credit
> you've been given thus far is great as it happens to support the side
> that I'm on. :D
>
> However, could you quantify what, exactly, you feel is approrpiate
> credit for reviewers and authors..? I'll intentionally omit the options
> that have been presented in the past to try and avoid influencing your
> response.
>
>
>
Mentioning them in list of contributors, for one.
