On 16 December 2014 at 21:45, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Simon Riggs (si...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >> On 16 December 2014 at 18:28, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: >> >> > For the sake of the archives, the idea I had been trying to propose is >> > to use a role's permissions as a mechanism to define what should be >> > audited. An example is: >> >> My understanding is that was done. > > Based on the discussion I had w/ Abhijit on IRC, and what I saw him > commit, it's not the same. I've been trying to catch up with him on IRC > to get clarification but havn't managed to yet. > > Abhijit, could you comment on the above (or, well, my earlier email > which had the details)? It's entirely possible that I've completely > misunderstood as I haven't dug into the code yet but rather focused on > the documentation.
Abhijit added the "roles" idea on Nov 27 after speaking with you. AFAIK, it is intended to perform as you requested. Please review... -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers