On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > I tend to agree. I think we should just live with the fact that not > every conceivable use case will be covered, at least initially.
To be clear: I still think I should go and make the changes that will make the feature play nice with all shipped non-default B-Tree operator classes, and will make it work with partial unique indexes [1]. That isn't difficult or controversial, AFAICT, and gets us very close to satisfying every conceivable use case. [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM3SWZQdv7GDLwPRv7=re-gg1qjlool3vcmaricbctyk8gw...@mail.gmail.com -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
