On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 06:26:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> >> Plan C (remove CATUPDATE altogether) also has some merit.  But adding a
> >> superuser override there would be entirely pointless.
> > This is be my recommendation.  I do not see the point of carrying the
> > option around just to confuse new users of pg_authid and reviewers of
> > the code.
> Yeah ... if no one's found it interesting in the 20 years since the
> code left Berkeley, it's unlikely that interest will emerge in the
> future.

No objection here.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to