Jason Tishler wrote: > Bruce, > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:42:30AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > To get into the FAQ, it should be something that happens _frequently_, > > hence FAQ. > > Understood. That is why is said "for consideration." > > > Fact is, cygwin may not even be needed in 7.4 because we are > > working on a native port. > > A Win32 native port in the 7.4 time frame is great news! However, I > hope that the Cygwin port will not be deprecated. There are compelling > reasons to still have a Cygwin PostgreSQL port just like there is with > Python, Perl, Vim, Emacs, etc. On the other hand, I wouldn't mind being > put out of the Cygwin PostgreSQL support business... :,)
I see no reason to remove cygwin support. I assume they will both continue to exist. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
