--On 29. Dezember 2014 12:55:11 -0500 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Given the lack of previous complaints, this probably isn't backpatching material, but it sure seems like a bit of attention to consistency would be warranted here.
Now that i read it i remember a client complaining about this some time ago. I forgot about it, but i think there's value in it to backpatch.
-- Thanks Bernd -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers