--On 29. Dezember 2014 12:55:11 -0500 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Given the lack of previous complaints, this probably isn't backpatching
material, but it sure seems like a bit of attention to consistency
would be warranted here.

Now that i read it i remember a client complaining about this some time ago. I forgot about it, but i think there's value in it to backpatch.

--
Thanks

        Bernd


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to