On 1/18/15 8:16 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-01-18 22:02:13 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Gierth >>> 2) in any event it is essentially deprecated in favour of standby_mode >>> and therefore moving it to src/bin seems like a wrong move on two counts? >> There were some discussions about that a couple of months ago, and the >> conclusion was to not remove it. Please see here for more information: >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/545946e9.8060...@gmx.net#545946e9.8060...@gmx.net > > Sure, but not removing doesn't imply moving it. The other tools don't > have a replacement and are more or less actively maintained. I don't > think that's really the case for pg_standby. We do *not* want to give > it more credence by declaring it to be part of core.
I don't really care much, but the discussion appeared to indicate that pg_standby currently does not have a full replacement. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
