Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 04:09:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After looking at the code, the minimum-change alternative would be more or
>> less as attached: first, get rid of the long-obsolete proposition that
>> autovacuum workers need fresher-than-usual stats; second, allow
>> pgstat_vacuum_stat to accept stats that are moderately stale (the number
>> given below allows them to be up to 50 seconds old); and third, suppress
>> wait-timeout warnings when the call is from pgstat_vacuum_stat. The third
>> point is what we need to avoid unnecessary buildfarm failures. The second
>> point addresses the idea that we don't need to stress the stats collector
>> too much for this.
> Only #3 belongs in a minimum-change patch. #1 and #2 solve and/or create
> different problems and operate independently of #3. A patch covering #3 alone
> sounds attractive.
[ raised eyebrow... ] In your previous message, you were advocating *for*
a change that was more invasive than this one. Why the change of heart?
In particular, I thought we'd already agreed to point #1.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
