Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In light of trying to become fully ISO/ANSI compliant (or even savvy ;)
> could we not make a jump at say 7.4 to having the same set of reserved
> keywords as SQL92/SQL99 and be done with it?
I disagree ... especially for SQL99 keywords that we're not even using.
Also, SQL99 keywords that are actually only function names would be
outright more difficult to reserve than not to reserve...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
