Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> writes:
> Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> Having pg_dump use repeatable read transactions for the processes
>> that import the snapshot would work fine, as long as they are
>> reading a snapshot which was captured by a serializable read only
>> deferrable transaction.
> It looks like the attached patch does it (although it is only
> lightly tested so far and only on the master branch). This seems
> like a back-patchable bug fix (to 9.3).
> Thoughts?
A comment seems essential here, because as written anybody would think
the test for a snapshot is a bug.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
