* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote: > On 29 January 2015 at 04:00, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > >> > If I'm following correctly, Peter's specifically talking about: > >> > > >> > [ USING ( <replaceable class="parameter">expression</replaceable> ) ] > >> > [ WITH CHECK ( <replaceable > >> > class="parameter">check_expression</replaceable> ) ] > >> > > >> > Where the USING parameter is 'expression' but the WITH CHECK parameter > >> > is 'check_expression'. He makes a good point, I believe, as > >> > "expression" is overly generic. I don't like the idea of using > >> > "barrier_expression" though as that ends up introducing a new term- how > >> > about "using_expression"? > >> > > I've gone ahead and made this minor change. > > Don't forget the ALTER POLICY page. This and some of the other things > being discussed on this thread ought to be copied there too.
Ah, yeah, good point, will address soon.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
