On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> >>> One thing that would probably *help* is if the list of attachments >>> mentioned the names of the files that were attached to each message >>> rather than just noting that they have some kind of attachment. If >>> people name their attachments sensibly, then you'll be able to >>> distinguish parallel-seqscan-v23.patch from >>> test-case-that-breaks-parallel-seqscan.sql, and that would be nice. >>> >> >> Yes, I was going to request that as well. >> >> > Ok, this is easy enough. There's a field missing in an API call but it > shouldn't be that hard - I'll add this to the short term todo. > > Filenames are now shown for attachments, including a direct link to the attachment itself. I've also run a job to populate all old threads. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
