Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Antonin Houska <a...@cybertec.at> writes: > > The special case is that the path passed to add_path_precheck() has costs > > *equal to* those of the old_path. If pathkeys, outer rells and costs are the > > same, as summarized in the comment above, I expect add_path_precheck() to > > return false. Do I misread anything? > > It does, so I don't see your point?
Just that pre-check is - in this special (and very rare?) case - more stringent than the proper check would be. -- Antonin Houska Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de, http://www.cybertec.at -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
