On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in
>> AlterTableGetLockLevel@tablecmds.c we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint,
>> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same
>> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts?
> A new version of the patch is attached which treats them as the same for
> locking. I think it is correct and improves readability to do so.

Well then, let's switch it to "Ready for committer". I am moving as
well this entry to the next CF with the same status.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to