On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> wrote: > On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> >> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in >> AlterTableGetLockLevel@tablecmds.c we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint, >> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same >> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts? > > > A new version of the patch is attached which treats them as the same for > locking. I think it is correct and improves readability to do so.
Well then, let's switch it to "Ready for committer". I am moving as well this entry to the next CF with the same status. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers