On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2015-02-18 17:15:18 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> >> - I don't think that the t_bits fields in htup_details.h should be >> >> updated either. >> > >> > Why not? Any not broken code should already use MinHeapTupleSize and >> > similar macros. >> >> Changing t_bits impacts HeapTupleHeaderData, ReorderBufferTupleBuf and >> similarly a couple of redo routines in heapam.c using >> HeapTupleHeaderData in a couple of structures not placing it at the >> end (compiler complains). > > The compiler will complain if you use a FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER in the > middle of a struct but not when when you embed a struct that uses it > into the middle another struct. At least gcc doesn't and I think it'd be > utterly broken if another compiler did that. If there's a compiler that > does so, we need to make it define FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER to 1.
clang does complain on my OSX laptop regarding that ;) -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
