Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:32, Justin Clift wrote:
> > Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > Yes it would. But while on the subject, why did you only mention it's
> > > availability being on the advocacy site?
> >
> > *We* mentioned it's availability being on the Advocacy site, because it
> > gives people a single place to go that has both PostgreSQL itself *and*
> > a site that's dedicated to giving a clear list of features, advantages,
> > case studies, etc.
>
> But why duplicate the "download PostgreSQL" page on advocacy? ISTM a
> link to the appropriate page on the main website would be fine -- and if
> the "download PostgreSQL" stuff on the main website isn't perfect, then
> we should improve it (and fix the underlying problem), rather than
> duplicating content on advocacy.postgresql.org
Why does our master web site still have 7.2.3 listed as the most recent
release?
http://www.ca.postgresql.org/sitess.html
In fact, the link mentioned on the main web page points to the mirror
page, not to any place to download it. If I choose FTP mirrors, that
works.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
