On Sat, Mar  7, 2015 at 12:52:15PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar  6, 2015 at 07:00:10PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > suggested to me as one change we could make that would reduce the risk
> > > of disk-based attacks while trading that off for a higher risk on the
> > > side of network-based attacks while not breaking the existing network
> > > protocol.  To make it very clear- it is not a solution but rather a poor
> > > bandaid.  What we really need is a new password based protocol which is
> > > based on a future-proof, well designed protocol, such as SCRAM.
> > 
> > Again, agreed.
> Great.
> Have you had a chance to review the SCRAM RFC or do you have any
> questions as it relates to how SCRAM works?  I'd love to start a proper
> discussion about how we go about implementing it.

I am feeling we have to wait for 9.5 to settle first.

  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to